Assessment of interleukin 17A and 23 in the course of bladder cancer and selected benign urological diseases.

Several cytokines have been indicated to be significantly involved in urological diseases. Interleukin 17A (IL-17A) and interleukin 23 (IL-23) have recently received attention for their involvement in inflammatory diseases and cancers. The aim of the study was to show changes in the level of pro-inflammatory interleukins IL-17A and IL-23 in patients with bladder cancer (BC) and selected urological diseases. An important cognitive aspect was to study the interdependencies between the studied interleukins and to assess their diagnostic value for such diseases. The material for the study was urine sample from patients with BC, urinary tract infection (UTI), urolithiasis, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), US (urethral stricture), which was compared to the urine sample of healthy people without urological disorders. Interleukin concentrations were measured by the immunoenzymatic method. The levels of IL-17A and IL-23 in the urine of patients with BC, UTI, BPH and US were significantly higher compared to the control group. Statistically significant differences were found in the level of both interleukins compared to the control group in all diseases except urolithiasis. IL-17A and IL-23 correlated with each other in patients with all urological diseases except urolithiasis. The results of the conducted studies showed that selected urological diseases changed the levels of IL-17A and IL-23 in the urine of patients. The observations made confirmed the participation of these interleukins in the course of the urological diseases, especially in BC, and allowed to classify them as potentially useful parameters for diagnostic purposes.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Parameters and Deterioration of Remaining Kidney Function in Living Donors.

INTRODUCTION: After living kidney donation, a decrease of kidney function (described as estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) is observed in majority of donors. However, the loss is more significant in some patients without an explicable reason. The aim of this study was to identify quantitative parameters in computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen that would predict greater eGFR reduction after kidney removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and ten preoperative multiphase CT examinations of the abdomen of kidney donors were analyzed for the following renal parameters: cortex, parenchyma and pyramids volume, scarring thickness (low grade: <1 cm, high grade: >1 cm), cortical gaps, vascularisation, and cortex-to-aorta enhancement index (CAEI). The radiologic and biometric (eg, donor weight) parameters were correlated with eGFR (CKD-EPI formula) change between baseline and at discharge. RESULTS: Donor weight was correlated with a loss of eGFR (P < .001). Kidney volumetric parameters including renal cortex and parenchyma volume, as well as renal artery cross-section area were associated with donor weight (r = 0.50 P < .001 and r = 0.39 P < .001). CAEI was correlated with a loss of eGFR (P = .003) and was related to the donor's sex in favor of men. Forty-one (37%) donors had an additional renal artery, which did not influence kidney function. No influence of cortical gaps or scarring on eGFR was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CAEI may be a helpful tool in predicting greater short-term kidney function decrease after living kidney donation. Male sex is the strongest risk factor of greater eGFR loss after kidney donation.

Endothelin A Receptors Expressed in Renal Blood Vessels of Renal Transplant Patients Are Connected With Acute Tubular Necrosis or Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: The role of non-HLA antibodies named antiendothelin A receptor antibodies is potentially significant but not established. The significance of the endothelin A receptor (ETAR) and its expression in renal biopsy has not been defined. We decided to evaluate the presence and relevance of ETARs in renal transplant biopsy for cause. The aim of our study was to evaluate the immunoreactivity of the ETAR and its significance in patients who had a renal transplant biopsy due to deterioration of transplant function (biopsy for cause) with detailed characterization of staining in small and intermediate arteries of renal transplant biopsies. METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of ETARs was analyzed in 162 renal transplant biopsies. Microscopic evaluation of ETAR expression (polyclonal antibody) was performed on paraffin sections. ETAR expression was analyzed in renal blood vessels (small and intermediate arteries) based on three-step scale. RESULTS: We analyzed 154 patients who had renal allograft biopsy between 6 days and 24 years (median 597 days) after transplantation. Positive staining of ETAR in small and intermediate arteries was noticed in 9 patients. Among these patients, 4 had early biopsies (<3 months after transplantation), all developed acute tubular necrosis, and 1 developed additionally acute humoral rejection. Further, 4 patients had late biopsy (1-8 years after transplantation) and all developed characteristics of antibody mediated rejection. Lastly, 1 patient had no characteristic changes in the biopsy 4 months after transplantation. Graft loss 1 year after biopsy was higher in patients who were ETAR-positive but statistical significance was not achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The expression of endothelin receptors in renal blood vessels (small and intermediate arteries) seems to be important in diagnosis of damage during acute tubular necrosis and antibody-mediated rejection.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Diagnostic Usefulness of Uroplakin 2 with an Assessment of the Antioxidant Potential of Patients with Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma is the most common type of bladder cancer (BC). It makes up more than 90% of all bladder cancers. Uroplakins are tissue-specific, glycoproteins, playing a role in the construction and function of urothelium. The emergence of uroplakins in the urine and/or plasma may be of potential importance in the early detection of BC. In our study, the diagnostic value of plasma and urine uroplakin 2 (UP2) concentration in bladder cancer was investigated, with an assessment of the antioxidant potential of BC patients. The correlation between UP2, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and concentration of glutathione (GSH) was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 61 BC patients and 33 healthy controls. UP2 concentration was estimated by the immunoenzymatic method (ELISA). TAC and GSH were determined in spectrophotometrically methods. RESULTS: UP2 concentration in BC patients was significantly higher (p≤0.001) both in plasma and in urine compared to the control groups (C). TAC concentration in urine (p≤0.001) and GSH concentration in plasma (p=0.047) were significantly lower in BC group compared to the C group. The high specificity and sensitivity for UPK2 in plasma (76%, 80%, respectively) and urine (88%, 84%, respectively) were observed. Positive correlations were observed between concentration of UP2 in plasma and TAC concentration in urine and between UP2 concentration in plasma and GSH concentration in the same material. CONCLUSION: The study showed the early diagnostic value of urine and plasma UP2 in BC. There was a decrease in UP2 concentration in the urine of patients with the development of BC. The decrease of antioxidant systems (TAC, GSH) indicates their relationship with the BC process. Based on the obtained results, it is justified to continue the study in a larger group of patients with BC.

A personalised approach to prostate cancer screening based on genotyping of risk founder alleles.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether genotyping for 18 prostate cancer founder variants is helpful in identifying high-risk individuals and for determining optimal screening regimens. METHODS: A serum PSA level was measured and a digital rectal examination (DRE) was performed on 2907 unaffected men aged 40-90. Three hundred and twenty-three men with an elevated PSA (≥4 ng ml⁻¹) or an abnormal DRE underwent a prostate biopsy. All men were genotyped for three founder alleles in BRCA1 (5382insC, 4153delA and C61G), for four alleles in CHEK2 (1100delC, IVS2+1G>A, del5395 and I157T), for one allele in NBS1 (657del5), for one allele in HOXB13 (G84E), and for nine low-risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). RESULTS: On the basis of an elevated PSA or an abnormal DRE, prostate cancer was diagnosed in 135 of 2907 men (4.6%). In men with a CHEK2 missense mutation I157T, the cancer detection rate among men with an elevated PSA or an abnormal DRE was much higher (10.2%, P=0.0008). The cancer detection rate rose with the number of SNP risk genotypes observed from 1.2% for men with no variant to 8.6% for men who carried six or more variants (P=0.04). No single variant was helpful on its own in predicting the presence of prostate cancer, however, the combination of all rare mutations and SNPs improved predictive power (area under the curve=0.59; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that testing for germline CHEK2 mutations improves the ability to predict the presence of prostate cancer in screened men, however, the clinical utility of incorporating DNA variants in the screening process is marginal.

An inherited NBN mutation is associated with poor prognosis prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To establish the contribution of eight founder alleles in three DNA damage repair genes (BRCA1, CHEK2 and NBS1) to prostate cancer in Poland, and to measure the impact of these variants on survival among patients. METHODS: Three thousand seven hundred fifty men with prostate cancer and 3956 cancer-free controls were genotyped for three founder alleles in BRCA1 (5382insC, 4153delA, C61G), four alleles in CHEK2 (1100delC, IVS2+1G>A, del5395, I157T), and one allele in NBS1 (657del5). RESULTS: The NBS1 mutation was detected in 53 of 3750 unselected cases compared with 23 of 3956 (0.6%) controls (odds ratio (OR)=2.5; P=0.0003). A CHEK2 mutation was seen in 383 (10.2%) unselected cases and in 228 (5.8%) controls (OR=1.9; P<0.0001). Mutation of BRCA1 (three mutations combined) was not associated with the risk of prostate cancer (OR=0.9; P=0.8). In a subgroup analysis, the 4153delA mutation was associated with early-onset (age ≤ 60 years) prostate cancer (OR=20.3, P=0.004). The mean follow-up was 54 months. Mortality was significantly worse for carriers of a NBS1 mutation than for non-carriers (HR=1.85; P=0.008). The 5-year survival for men with an NBS1 mutation was 49%, compared with 72% for mutation-negative cases. CONCLUSION: A mutation in NBS1 predisposes to aggressive prostate cancer. These data are relevant to the prospect of adapting personalised medicine to prostate cancer prevention and treatment.

A large germline deletion in the Chek2 kinase gene is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the Chek2 kinase gene (CHEK2) have been associated with a range of cancer types. Recently, a large deletion of exons 9 and 10 of CHEK2 was identified in several unrelated patients with breast cancer of Czech or Slovak origin. The geographical and ethnic extent of this founder allele has not yet been determined. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We assayed for the presence of this deletion, and of three other CHEK2 founder mutations, in 1864 patients with prostate cancer and 5496 controls from Poland. RESULTS: The deletion was detected in 24 of 5496 (0.4%) controls from the general population, and is the most common CHEK2 truncating founder allele in Polish patients. The deletion was identified in 15 of 1864 (0.8%) men with unselected prostate cancer (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.97 to 3.5; p = 0.09) and in 4 of 249 men with familial prostate cancer (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 10.8; p = 0.03). These ORs were similar to those associated with the other truncating mutations (IVS2+1G-->A, 1100delC). CONCLUSION: A large deletion of exons 9 and 10 of CHEK2 confers an increased risk of prostate cancer in Polish men. The del5395 founder deletion might be present in other Slavic populations, including Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Baltic and Balkan countries. It will be of interest to see to what extent this deletion is responsible for the burden of prostate cancer in other populations.